The RIR (Reps In Reserve) debate dominates muscle-building discussions: Should you grind every set to absolute failure, or is there a sweet spot that manages fatigue while still driving hypertrophy?

Based on recent scientific meta-analyses, here’s what the research actually shows about training intensity and how to apply it to your program.

The 6-12 Rep “Hypertrophy Zone” Is Outdated

For decades, the standard advice was to train in the 6-to-12 repetition range for muscle growth. Modern research has debunked this.

Studies now show that as long as you train close to failure, you achieve similar muscle gains across a much wider range: 5 to 30 repetitions per set.

Whether you’re doing heavy 6-rep sets or lighter 25-rep pump sets, the growth stimulus on a set-per-set basis is comparable—provided you take those sets sufficiently close to muscular failure.

The “Effective Reps” Model: What Research Actually Shows

A popular theory claims that only the final 5 repetitions before failure truly stimulate growth. While this sounds intuitive, research doesn’t fully support a sudden cutoff point.

The reality comes down to motor unit recruitment. To maximize muscle growth, you need to recruit and fatigue the largest, highest-growth-potential muscle fibers (Type II fibers).

Research indicates that maximum motor unit recruitment occurs well before the last five reps—it’s closer to 8 RIR (8 reps from failure), especially with proper exercise selection and explosive intent on the concentric phase.

Growth is a gradual process, not a switch that flips in the final reps.

Does Training to Failure Build More Muscle?

Should you train to momentary muscle failure (0 RIR) on every set?

One meta-analysis suggested that leaving even a few reps in reserve dramatically reduces gains. However, this finding is statistically anomalous and contradicts the overall trend of published research.

The key finding from reliable meta-analyses: There is no evidence that training to momentary muscle failure is superior to non-failure training for muscle hypertrophy when total volume is equated.

The advantage of failure training often comes from accumulating more total repetitions (volume), not from failure itself. When researchers equate the number of repetitions between groups training to failure and groups stopping short, muscle growth is equivalent.

Two Paths to the Same Results

The science points to two effective approaches. The right choice depends on your preferences, schedule, and how well you manage fatigue.

Path	Strategy	Pros	Cons
Intensity Focus	Fewer sets, train to failure (0 RIR)	Time-efficient, simpler programming, maximum reps per set	Accumulates more neuromuscular fatigue, can reduce quality of subsequent sets
Volume Focus	More sets, stop short (2-4 RIR)	Better stimulus-to-fatigue ratio, better technique, higher quality across sets	Requires more gym time to accumulate necessary volume

The bottom line: You can achieve equivalent muscle growth with either approach, provided your total effective volume is the same.

• Short on time? Training to failure on select sets is an efficient strategy
• Prioritizing recovery? Stopping 2-4 reps short allows for more total sets and consistent long-term progress

Practical Applications

Here’s how to apply this research to your training:

1. Pick your approach based on your constraints. If you only have 30 minutes, push your sets closer to failure. If you have the time, do more sets at 2-4 RIR.

2. Track your hard sets, not just total sets. A set at RPE 6 doesn’t drive the same adaptation as a set at RPE 9. Focus on sets that are genuinely challenging.

3. Monitor fatigue across your session. If your performance drops significantly from set to set, you may be accumulating too much fatigue from failure training.

4. Adjust based on exercise type. Compound movements (squats, deadlifts) generate more systemic fatigue—stopping 2-3 reps short often makes sense. Isolation exercises can be taken closer to failure with less recovery cost.

SetsApart is designed for exactly this purpose. Instead of logging every rep, you track your hard sets per muscle group—the sets that actually drive growth. Whether you’re training to failure or stopping at 2-3 RIR, what matters is that you’re tracking the sets that count.

Key Takeaways

• The old 6-12 rep “hypertrophy zone” is outdated—5 to 30 reps works when taken close to failure
• Training to failure isn’t required for muscle growth when volume is equated
• Both high-intensity (fewer sets, to failure) and high-volume (more sets, 2-4 RIR) approaches work
• Choose based on your available time and recovery capacity
• Track hard sets, not just total volume

---

Source

This article was inspired by and summarizes key insights from the following video. Check out the video for more detail and subscribe to the channel—it’s a great resource for evidence-based training.

Watch the full video: How close to failure should you train?